Phoenix — case intelligence
Ask the case anything. Every answer carries its proof.
Phoenix reads the whole file — documents, texts, journal, mail — and answers in plain English. Every sentence returns with a numbered source and a verbatim quote that actually appears in that source, so checking an answer takes one click, not an argument.
Every sentence must earn its place in the answer.
Before you see an answer, a server-side gate checks each claim: the quote behind it has to be found, verbatim, in the cited source. A claim that can't produce its quote is removed — and the count is shown.
The temporary orders hearing was continued to August 3 at the petitioner's request.[1] Exchange records show four late pickups in July, each noted the same day.[2] The other party has a history of similar conduct in prior proceedings. The bank statements produced so far cover January through May; June and July remain outstanding.[3]
- [1] Notice of hearing — filed 7/22
…is hereby continued to August 3 at 9:00 a.m. on Petitioner's motion…
- [2] Day log — July entries
Pickup 6:41pm, scheduled 6:00pm. Noted at the exchange.
- [3] Document requests — financial records
Bank statements: January–May received and accepted. June–July requested.
IllustrationA diagram of the mechanism, not a product screenshot — the answers in the product cite your case's real documents.
The questions every divorce case gets asked.
Named analyses run on demand, each through the same citation gate, each saved to the case when you keep it.
Filing breakdown
What a filing claims, what it asks the court to do, and the dates inside it — before you've poured the coffee.
Disclosure table
What has been produced, what is outstanding, and where the produced records disagree with each other.
Admissions & threats
The statements in the record that matter — located, quoted, and attributed to their source.
Fact timeline
The case's events assembled into one dated chronology, each entry carrying the document it came from.
Exchange patterns
Custody exchanges over time — the lates, the misses, the notes — read out of the day logs and messages.
Missing documents
What the file should contain by now and doesn't — checked against the requests that went out.
Ask the whole firm, not just one file.
Phoenix also answers across the practice — caseload, unbilled work, what is due this week, which matters have gone quiet — with the same rule everywhere: a source and a quote behind every claim, scoped to what your role is allowed to see.
It's in the matter workspace, in the portal, and on the phone. Ask on the way to the courthouse.
Ask something the file does not answer, and Phoenix tells you so — which is exactly what you want from the person you'd otherwise have asked.
Why the gate existsAnd when the work runs deeper
For research, analysis and written reporting, DeepWeave takes the question further — with every citation checked against the law library before you read it.
Bring the question your file should answer.
In a demonstration, Phoenix runs on a real case — and you check the quotes yourself.